GHSA-236R-Q498-MCW6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:02 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:02
VLAI?
Details
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices with software 7.0 before 7.0(8.12), 7.1 and 7.2 before 7.2(5.2), 8.0 before 8.0(5.21), 8.1 before 8.1(2.49), 8.2 before 8.2(3.6), and 8.3 before 8.3(2.7) and Cisco PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, when transparent firewall mode is configured but IPv6 is not configured, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (packet buffer exhaustion and device outage) via IPv6 traffic, aka Bug ID CSCtj04707.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-0393"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-02-25T12:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices with software 7.0 before 7.0(8.12), 7.1 and 7.2 before 7.2(5.2), 8.0 before 8.0(5.21), 8.1 before 8.1(2.49), 8.2 before 8.2(3.6), and 8.3 before 8.3(2.7) and Cisco PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, when transparent firewall mode is configured but IPv6 is not configured, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (packet buffer exhaustion and device outage) via IPv6 traffic, aka Bug ID CSCtj04707.",
"id": "GHSA-236r-q498-mcw6",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:02:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:02:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65589"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43488"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b6e14d.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0493"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…