GHSA-262X-VPC4-RWC6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-01 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-10 21:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: clear out_curr if all frag chunks of current msg are pruned

A crash was reported by Zhen Chen:

list_del corruption, ffffa035ddf01c18->next is NULL WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 250682 at lib/list_debug.c:49 __list_del_entry_valid+0x59/0xe0 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x59/0xe0 Call Trace: sctp_sched_dequeue_common+0x17/0x70 [sctp] sctp_sched_fcfs_dequeue+0x37/0x50 [sctp] sctp_outq_flush_data+0x85/0x360 [sctp] sctp_outq_uncork+0x77/0xa0 [sctp] sctp_cmd_interpreter.constprop.0+0x164/0x1450 [sctp] sctp_side_effects+0x37/0xe0 [sctp] sctp_do_sm+0xd0/0x230 [sctp] sctp_primitive_SEND+0x2f/0x40 [sctp] sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc+0x3fa/0x5c0 [sctp] sctp_sendmsg+0x3d5/0x440 [sctp] sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x70

and in sctp_sched_fcfs_dequeue() it dequeued a chunk from stream out_curr outq while this outq was empty.

Normally stream->out_curr must be set to NULL once all frag chunks of current msg are dequeued, as we can see in sctp_sched_dequeue_done(). However, in sctp_prsctp_prune_unsent() as it is not a proper dequeue, sctp_sched_dequeue_done() is not called to do this.

This patch is to fix it by simply setting out_curr to NULL when the last frag chunk of current msg is dequeued from out_curr stream in sctp_prsctp_prune_unsent().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49838"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T15:16:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: clear out_curr if all frag chunks of current msg are pruned\n\nA crash was reported by Zhen Chen:\n\n  list_del corruption, ffffa035ddf01c18-\u003enext is NULL\n  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 250682 at lib/list_debug.c:49 __list_del_entry_valid+0x59/0xe0\n  RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x59/0xe0\n  Call Trace:\n   sctp_sched_dequeue_common+0x17/0x70 [sctp]\n   sctp_sched_fcfs_dequeue+0x37/0x50 [sctp]\n   sctp_outq_flush_data+0x85/0x360 [sctp]\n   sctp_outq_uncork+0x77/0xa0 [sctp]\n   sctp_cmd_interpreter.constprop.0+0x164/0x1450 [sctp]\n   sctp_side_effects+0x37/0xe0 [sctp]\n   sctp_do_sm+0xd0/0x230 [sctp]\n   sctp_primitive_SEND+0x2f/0x40 [sctp]\n   sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc+0x3fa/0x5c0 [sctp]\n   sctp_sendmsg+0x3d5/0x440 [sctp]\n   sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x70\n\nand in sctp_sched_fcfs_dequeue() it dequeued a chunk from stream\nout_curr outq while this outq was empty.\n\nNormally stream-\u003eout_curr must be set to NULL once all frag chunks of\ncurrent msg are dequeued, as we can see in sctp_sched_dequeue_done().\nHowever, in sctp_prsctp_prune_unsent() as it is not a proper dequeue,\nsctp_sched_dequeue_done() is not called to do this.\n\nThis patch is to fix it by simply setting out_curr to NULL when the\nlast frag chunk of current msg is dequeued from out_curr stream in\nsctp_prsctp_prune_unsent().",
  "id": "GHSA-262x-vpc4-rwc6",
  "modified": "2025-11-10T21:30:28Z",
  "published": "2025-05-01T15:31:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49838"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ea600b598dd3e061854dd4dd5b4c815397dfcea"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f201ae14ae0f91dbf1cffea7bb1e29e81d4d108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3eff34e01062ec08fbb45ce2baaaa644550be821"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e27458b18b35caee4b27b37a4a9c503b93cae5cc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…