ghsa-26x4-fg42-26fj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:22
Modified
2022-05-13 01:22
Severity ?
Details
An Invalid Address dereference was discovered in TIFFWriteDirectoryTagTransferfunction in libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c in LibTIFF 4.0.10, affecting the cpSeparateBufToContigBuf function in tiffcp.c. Remote attackers could leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. This is different from CVE-2018-12900.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-7663" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-02-09T16:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "An Invalid Address dereference was discovered in TIFFWriteDirectoryTagTransferfunction in libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c in LibTIFF 4.0.10, affecting the cpSeparateBufToContigBuf function in tiffcp.c. Remote attackers could leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. This is different from CVE-2018-12900.", "id": "GHSA-26x4-fg42-26fj", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:22:52Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:22:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-7663" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/commit/802d3cbf3043be5dce5317e140ccb1c17a6a2d39" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/02/msg00026.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-25" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3906-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3906-2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4670" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2833" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00041.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.