GHSA-27JP-WM6Q-GP25
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-13 16:16 – Updated: 2026-02-13 16:16
VLAI?
Summary
sqlparse: formatting list of tuples leads to denial of service
Details
Summary
The below gist hangs while attempting to format a long list of tuples.
This was found while drafting a regression test for Dja ngo 5.2's composite primary key feature, which allows querying composite fields with tuples.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.5.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "sqlparse"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-13T16:16:11Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe below gist hangs while attempting to format a long list of tuples.\n\nThis was found while [drafting a regression test for Dja\nngo 5.2\u0027s composite primary key feature](https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/36416#comment:3), which allows querying composite fields with tuples.\n\n###",
"id": "GHSA-27jp-wm6q-gp25",
"modified": "2026-02-13T16:16:11Z",
"published": "2026-02-13T16:16:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/andialbrecht/sqlparse/security/advisories/GHSA-27jp-wm6q-gp25"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/andialbrecht/sqlparse/commit/40ed3aa958657fa4a82055927fa9de70ab903360"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/andialbrecht/sqlparse"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/andialbrecht/sqlparse/releases/tag/0.5.4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "sqlparse: formatting list of tuples leads to denial of service"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…