ghsa-27rr-v6v6-57q8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:51
Modified
2022-05-01 01:51
Details

Buffer overflow in Sylpheed before 1.0.3 and other versions before 1.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an e-mail message with certain headers containing non-ASCII characters that are not properly handled when the user replies to the message.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-0667"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-03-07T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in Sylpheed before 1.0.3 and other versions before 1.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an e-mail message with certain headers containing non-ASCII characters that are not properly handled when the user replies to the message.",
  "id": "GHSA-27rr-v6v6-57q8",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:51:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:51:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0667"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/14491"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1013376"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sylpheed.good-day.net/changelog-devel.html.en"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sylpheed.good-day.net/changelog.html.en"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200503-26.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-303.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.