GHSA-27X2-682M-9QM4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mptcp: pm: kernel: drop pending ADD_ADDR when removing ID0

The in-kernel MPTCP path manager can leave a stale ADD_ADDR announcement entry alive when removing the id 0 endpoint. This happens because the id 0 removal path does not tear down pending announcements, unlike the non-zero id path.

When the PM later reselects id 0 after adding another signal endpoint, it finds the stale anno_list entry and hits WARN_ON_ONCE(mptcp_pm_is_kernel()) in mptcp_pm_announced_alloc().

Root cause: asymmetry between removal paths. - Non-zero id path: mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr() calls mptcp_pm_remove_announced() to clean up. - Id 0 path: mptcp_nl_remove_id_zero_address() skips cleanup entirely.

Fix by making the id 0 path symmetric: call mptcp_pm_announced_remove() and decrement add_addr_signaled before queuing the RM_ADDR.

Subtle detail: signal endpoints are stored in anno_list with port 0, but msk_local carries the connection's local port. In other words, entries linked to ID0 paths should have port == 0. A follow-up patch will ensure that. mptcp_pm_announced_remove() uses use_port=true for comparison. So clear the port before the lookup.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-97566"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:07Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: pm: kernel: drop pending ADD_ADDR when removing ID0\n\nThe in-kernel MPTCP path manager can leave a stale ADD_ADDR announcement\nentry alive when removing the id 0 endpoint. This happens because the id 0\nremoval path does not tear down pending announcements, unlike the non-zero\nid path.\n\nWhen the PM later reselects id 0 after adding another signal endpoint, it\nfinds the stale anno_list entry and hits WARN_ON_ONCE(mptcp_pm_is_kernel())\nin mptcp_pm_announced_alloc().\n\nRoot cause: asymmetry between removal paths.\n- Non-zero id path: mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr() calls\n  mptcp_pm_remove_announced() to clean up.\n- Id 0 path: mptcp_nl_remove_id_zero_address() skips cleanup entirely.\n\nFix by making the id 0 path symmetric: call mptcp_pm_announced_remove()\nand decrement add_addr_signaled before queuing the RM_ADDR.\n\nSubtle detail: signal endpoints are stored in anno_list with port 0, but\nmsk_local carries the connection\u0027s local port. In other words, entries\nlinked to ID0 paths should have port == 0. A follow-up patch will ensure\nthat. mptcp_pm_announced_remove() uses use_port=true for comparison. So\nclear the port before the lookup.",
  "id": "GHSA-27x2-682m-9qm4",
  "modified": "2026-09-25T12:31:24Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T12:31:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97566"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ac7d6e620764f1fc79eb4edd3610a7a661981ca"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/545616b4e7325be3c61fc082538cb06d14f7b1db"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d4a67a880654e1bfe318a31bea0bdbb026a09ade"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…