GHSA-28XW-M7JP-89CH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:04 – Updated: 2022-12-14 21:30
VLAI?
Details
sa-exim 4.2.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code if they can write a .cf file or a rule. This occurs because Greylisting.pm relies on eval (rather than direct parsing and/or use of the taint feature). This issue is similar to CVE-2018-11805.
Severity ?
8.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-19920"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-12-22T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "sa-exim 4.2.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code if they can write a .cf file or a rule. This occurs because Greylisting.pm relies on eval (rather than direct parsing and/or use of the taint feature). This issue is similar to CVE-2018-11805.",
"id": "GHSA-28xw-m7jp-89ch",
"modified": "2022-12-14T21:30:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:04:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19920"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/946829#24"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/01/msg00006.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users\u0026m=157668107325768\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users\u0026m=157668305026635\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4520-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…