ghsa-2956-2v8q-xc52
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:48
Modified
2022-05-24 17:48
Severity ?
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X200-4P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X201-3P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PRO (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2 IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2P IRT (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PRO (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204 IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204 IRT PRO (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2FM (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2LD (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2LD TS (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2TS (All versions), SCALANCE X206-1 (All versions), SCALANCE X206-1LD (All versions), SCALANCE X208 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X208PRO (All versions), SCALANCE X212-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X212-2LD (All versions), SCALANCE X216 (All versions), SCALANCE X224 (All versions), SCALANCE XF201-3P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF202-2P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF204 (All versions), SCALANCE XF204 IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF204-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF206-1 (All versions), SCALANCE XF208 (All versions). Incorrect processing of POST requests in the web server may write out of bounds in stack. An attacker might leverage this to denial-of-service of the device or remote code execution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-25669"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-121",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-04-22T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X200-4P IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X201-3P IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PRO (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2 IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2P IRT (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PRO (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204 IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204 IRT PRO (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2FM (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2LD (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2LD TS (All versions), SCALANCE X204-2TS (All versions), SCALANCE X206-1 (All versions), SCALANCE X206-1LD (All versions), SCALANCE X208 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X208PRO (All versions), SCALANCE X212-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE X212-2LD (All versions), SCALANCE X216 (All versions), SCALANCE X224 (All versions), SCALANCE XF201-3P IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF202-2P IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF204 (All versions), SCALANCE XF204 IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF204-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions), SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRT (All versions \u003c 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF206-1 (All versions), SCALANCE XF208 (All versions). Incorrect processing of POST requests in the web server may write out of bounds in stack. An attacker might leverage this to denial-of-service of the device or remote code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-2956-2v8q-xc52",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:48:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:48:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-25669"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-187092.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.