GHSA-2988-2X63-C565

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:51 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:51
VLAI?
Details

** DISPUTED ** Microsoft ISA Server 2004 allows remote attackers to bypass certain filtering rules, including ones for (1) ICMP and (2) TCP, via IPv6 packets. NOTE: An established researcher has disputed this issue, saying that "Neither ISA Server 2004 nor Windows 2003 Basic Firewall support IPv6 filtering ... This is different network protocol."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-1651"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-04-06T10:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED **  Microsoft ISA Server 2004 allows remote attackers to bypass certain filtering rules, including ones for (1) ICMP and (2) TCP, via IPv6 packets.  NOTE: An established researcher has disputed this issue, saying that \"Neither ISA Server 2004 nor Windows 2003 Basic Firewall support IPv6 filtering ... This is different network protocol.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-2988-2x63-c565",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:51:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:51:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1651"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429816/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429846/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/430281/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/430684/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…