ghsa-2c4f-vgwr-82q6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-07-21 21:30
Modified
2024-04-04 06:18
Severity ?
Details
A missing allocation check in sftp server processing read requests may cause a NULL dereference on low-memory conditions. The malicious client can request up to 4GB SFTP reads, causing allocation of up to 4GB buffers, which was not being checked for failure. This will likely crash the authenticated user's sftp server connection (if implemented as forking as recommended). For thread-based servers, this might also cause DoS for legitimate users.
Given this code is not in any released versions, no security releases have been issued.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-3603" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476", "CWE-770" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2023-07-21T20:15:16Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A missing allocation check in sftp server processing read requests may cause a NULL dereference on low-memory conditions. The malicious client can request up to 4GB SFTP reads, causing allocation of up to 4GB buffers, which was not being checked for failure. This will likely crash the authenticated user\u0027s sftp server connection (if implemented as forking as recommended). For thread-based servers, this might also cause DoS for legitimate users.\n\nGiven this code is not in any released versions, no security releases have been issued.", "id": "GHSA-2c4f-vgwr-82q6", "modified": "2024-04-04T06:18:44Z", "published": "2023-07-21T21:30:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3603" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3603" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221791" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.