ghsa-2c62-8p8p-hh5w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:38
Modified
2022-05-17 02:38
Severity ?
Details
Libgcrypt before 1.6.5 does not properly perform elliptic-point curve multiplication during decryption, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to extract ECDH keys by measuring electromagnetic emanations.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-7511" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-04-19T21:59:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Libgcrypt before 1.6.5 does not properly perform elliptic-point curve multiplication during decryption, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to extract ECDH keys by measuring electromagnetic emanations.", "id": "GHSA-2c62-8p8p-hh5w", "modified": "2022-05-17T02:38:26Z", "published": "2022-05-17T02:38:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7511" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W2IL4PAEICHGA2XMQYRY3MIWHM4GMPAG" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2016q1/000384.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-04" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00027.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cs.tau.ac.IL/~tromer/ecdh" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3474" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3478" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/83253" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2896-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.