ghsa-2c62-8p8p-hh5w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:38
Modified
2025-04-12 12:58
Severity ?
Details
Libgcrypt before 1.6.5 does not properly perform elliptic-point curve multiplication during decryption, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to extract ECDH keys by measuring electromagnetic emanations.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-7511", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2016-04-19T21:59:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "Libgcrypt before 1.6.5 does not properly perform elliptic-point curve multiplication during decryption, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to extract ECDH keys by measuring electromagnetic emanations.", id: "GHSA-2c62-8p8p-hh5w", modified: "2025-04-12T12:58:52Z", published: "2022-05-17T02:38:26Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7511", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W2IL4PAEICHGA2XMQYRY3MIWHM4GMPAG", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W2IL4PAEICHGA2XMQYRY3MIWHM4GMPAG", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2016q1/000384.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-04", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00027.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.cs.tau.ac.IL/~tromer/ecdh", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3474", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3478", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/83253", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2896-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.