GHSA-2F2R-5V47-WCR9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-21 12:31 – Updated: 2025-09-17 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-mapping: benchmark: fix node id validation
While validating node ids in map_benchmark_ioctl(), node_possible() may be provided with invalid argument outside of [0,MAX_NUMNODES-1] range leading to:
BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214) Read of size 8 at addr 1fffffff8ccb6398 by task dma_map_benchma/971 CPU: 7 PID: 971 Comm: dma_map_benchma Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6 #37 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603) kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189) variable_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227) [inline] arch_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239) [inline] _test_bit at (include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142) [inline] node_state (include/linux/nodemask.h:423) [inline] map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214) full_proxy_unlocked_ioctl (fs/debugfs/file.c:333) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Compare node ids with sane bounds first. NUMA_NO_NODE is considered a special valid case meaning that benchmarking kthreads won't be bound to a cpuset of a given node.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-34777"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-21T12:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndma-mapping: benchmark: fix node id validation\n\nWhile validating node ids in map_benchmark_ioctl(), node_possible() may\nbe provided with invalid argument outside of [0,MAX_NUMNODES-1] range\nleading to:\n\nBUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214)\nRead of size 8 at addr 1fffffff8ccb6398 by task dma_map_benchma/971\nCPU: 7 PID: 971 Comm: dma_map_benchma Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6 #37\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\ndump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117)\nkasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603)\nkasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189)\nvariable_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227) [inline]\narch_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239) [inline]\n_test_bit at (include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142) [inline]\nnode_state (include/linux/nodemask.h:423) [inline]\nmap_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214)\nfull_proxy_unlocked_ioctl (fs/debugfs/file.c:333)\n__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\n\nCompare node ids with sane bounds first. NUMA_NO_NODE is considered a\nspecial valid case meaning that benchmarking kthreads won\u0027t be bound to a\ncpuset of a given node.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).",
"id": "GHSA-2f2r-5v47-wcr9",
"modified": "2025-09-17T18:31:14Z",
"published": "2024-06-21T12:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ff05e723f7ca30644b8ec3fb093f16312e408ad"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/34a816d8735f3924b74be8e5bf766ade1f3bd10b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35d31c8bd4722b107f5a2f5ddddce839de04b936"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63e7e05a48a35308aeddd7ecccb68363a5988e87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c57874265a3c5206d7aece3793bb2fc9abcd7570"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.