ghsa-2g4j-2xqp-4hq5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:14
Modified
2022-05-13 01:14
Severity ?
Details
In coders/xbm.c in ImageMagick 7.0.6-1 Q16, a DoS in ReadXBMImage() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted XBM file, which claims large rows and columns fields in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over the rows would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-14175" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-834" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-09-07T06:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In coders/xbm.c in ImageMagick 7.0.6-1 Q16, a DoS in ReadXBMImage() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted XBM file, which claims large rows and columns fields in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over the rows would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.", "id": "GHSA-2g4j-2xqp-4hq5", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:14:37Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:14:37Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14175" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/712" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/d9a8234d211da30baf9526fbebe9a8438ea7e11c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.