GHSA-2JX2-275X-4XPQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:50 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:50
VLAI?
Details
Multiple off-by-one errors in the (1) token and (2) linetoken functions in backend/dvi/mdvi-lib/afmparse.c in t1lib, as used in teTeX 3.0.x, GNOME evince, and possibly other products, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a DVI file containing a crafted Adobe Font Metrics (AFM) file, different vulnerabilities than CVE-2010-2642 and CVE-2011-0433.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-5244"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-11-19T12:10:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple off-by-one errors in the (1) token and (2) linetoken functions in backend/dvi/mdvi-lib/afmparse.c in t1lib, as used in teTeX 3.0.x, GNOME evince, and possibly other products, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a DVI file containing a crafted Adobe Font Metrics (AFM) file, different vulnerabilities than CVE-2010-2642 and CVE-2011-0433.",
"id": "GHSA-2jx2-275x-4xpq",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:50:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:50:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-57"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.gnome.org/browse/evince/commit/?id=439c5070022e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.gnome.org/browse/evince/commit/?id=d4139205b010"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/21"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…