GHSA-2JX4-7QPJ-C9GC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:29 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:29
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in Citadel SMTP server 7.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long RCPT TO command, which is not properly handled by the makeuserkey function. NOTE: some of these details were obtained from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-0394"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-01-23T12:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in Citadel SMTP server 7.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long RCPT TO command, which is not properly handled by the makeuserkey function. NOTE: some of these details were obtained from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-2jx4-7qpj-c9gc",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:29:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:29:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39807"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4949"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28590"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.milw0rm.com/sploits/2008-vs-GNU-citadel.tar.gz"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27376"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019255"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0252"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…