GHSA-2MCJ-95P4-49MV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-23 21:30 – Updated: 2026-09-24 06:31
VLAI
Details

A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The provisioning-callback secret (host_config_key) is exposed to users holding only the read-level view_jobtemplate permission -- both in the job template API representation and in the activity stream -- and the provisioning callback endpoint trusts a client-supplied X-Forwarded-For header to determine the calling host when the controller is deployed behind the AAP gateway with an empty proxy allow-list. By reading the secret and spoofing X-Forwarded-For to match any host in the job template's inventory, a minimally privileged or unauthenticated remote attacker can launch the job template against arbitrary managed hosts using the job template's credentials, resulting in privilege escalation and remote code execution on managed hosts.

Severity
9.9 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-84474"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-807"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-23T19:19:39Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform\u0027s automation-\ncontroller. The provisioning-callback secret (host_config_key) is exposed to\nusers holding only the read-level view_jobtemplate permission -- both in the\njob template API representation and in the activity stream -- and the\nprovisioning callback endpoint trusts a client-supplied X-Forwarded-For\nheader to determine the calling host when the controller is deployed behind\nthe AAP gateway with an empty proxy allow-list. By reading the secret and\nspoofing X-Forwarded-For to match any host in the job template\u0027s inventory, a\nminimally privileged or unauthenticated remote attacker can launch the job\ntemplate against arbitrary managed hosts using the job template\u0027s credentials,\nresulting in privilege escalation and remote code execution on managed hosts.",
  "id": "GHSA-2mcj-95p4-49mv",
  "modified": "2026-09-24T06:31:13Z",
  "published": "2026-09-23T21:30:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84474"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71115"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84474"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2527073"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.