ghsa-2p9p-xfg3-2fr3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:10
Modified
2022-05-02 06:10
Details
BIND 9.7.1 and 9.7.1-P1, when a recursive validating server has a trust anchor that is configured statically or via DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV), allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a query for an RRSIG record whose answer is not in the cache, which causes BIND to repeatedly send RRSIG queries to the authoritative servers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-0213"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-07-28T12:48:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "BIND 9.7.1 and 9.7.1-P1, when a recursive validating server has a trust anchor that is configured statically or via DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV), allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a query for an RRSIG record whose answer is not in the cache, which causes BIND to repeatedly send RRSIG queries to the authoritative servers.",
"id": "GHSA-2p9p-xfg3-2fr3",
"modified": "2022-05-02T06:10:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T06:10:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/044445.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40652"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40709"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2010-0213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/211905"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024217"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1884"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.