ghsa-2pj2-gchf-wmw7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-01-10 03:30
Modified
2023-01-27 17:41
Severity ?
Summary
Zip4j Origin Validation Error
Details
Zip4j through 2.11.2, as used in Threema and other products, does not always check the MAC when decrypting a ZIP archive. This issue has been fixed in version 2.11.3.
{ affected: [ { database_specific: { last_known_affected_version_range: "<= 2.11.2", }, package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "net.lingala.zip4j:zip4j", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "2.11.3", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-22899", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-346", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2023-01-13T21:34:45Z", nvd_published_at: "2023-01-10T02:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Zip4j through 2.11.2, as used in Threema and other products, does not always check the MAC when decrypting a ZIP archive. This issue has been fixed in version 2.11.3.", id: "GHSA-2pj2-gchf-wmw7", modified: "2023-01-27T17:41:12Z", published: "2023-01-10T03:30:29Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22899", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/srikanth-lingala/zip4j/issues/485", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://breakingthe3ma.app", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://breakingthe3ma.app/files/Threema-PST22.pdf", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/srikanth-lingala/zip4j", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/srikanth-lingala/zip4j/releases", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/srikanth-lingala/zip4j/releases/tag/v2.11.3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34316206", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://threema.ch/en/blog/posts/news-alleged-weaknesses-statement", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Zip4j Origin Validation Error", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.