GHSA-2Q8J-P5MW-6MF5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 21:30 – Updated: 2025-12-16 21:30
VLAI?
Details

Insecure defaults in the Server Agent component of Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) can result in the selection of weak password hash algorithms.  This issue affects BoKS Server Agent 9.0 instances that support yescrypt and are running in a BoKS 8.1 domain.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-13532"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-916"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T20:15:47Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Insecure defaults in the Server Agent component of Fortra\u0027s Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) can result in the selection of weak password hash algorithms. \u00a0This issue affects BoKS Server Agent 9.0 instances that support yescrypt and are running in a BoKS 8.1 domain.",
  "id": "GHSA-2q8j-p5mw-6mf5",
  "modified": "2025-12-16T21:30:55Z",
  "published": "2025-12-16T21:30:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13532"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.fortra.com/security/advisories/product-security/fi-2025-014"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…