GHSA-2QF2-98WP-CWM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:31 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:31
VLAI?
Details
OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-7270"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-12-06T22:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180.",
"id": "GHSA-2qf2-98wp-cwm9",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:31:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:31:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-7270"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659462"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17489"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=132077688910227\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42493"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1029-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0977.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0978.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0896.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/522176"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45254"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…