GHSA-2RFJ-W5WQ-M6CG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:31 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:31
VLAI
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in Battlefront Dropteam 1.3.3 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted "0x5c" packet or (2) many 32-bit numbers in a "0x18" packet, or cause a denial of service (crash) via (3) a large "0x4b" packet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5263"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-10-08T21:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in Battlefront Dropteam 1.3.3 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted \"0x5c\" packet or (2) many 32-bit numbers in a \"0x18\" packet, or cause a denial of service (crash) via (3) a large \"0x4b\" packet.",
"id": "GHSA-2rfj-w5wq-m6cg",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:31:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:31:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36975"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36976"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36977"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/dropteamz-adv.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3202"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/481616/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25943"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…