ghsa-2rqg-r6g4-rvxh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:58
Modified
2022-04-29 02:58
Details
Integer signedness error in the ssh2_rdpkt function in PuTTY before 0.56 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SSH2_MSG_DEBUG packet with a modified stringlen parameter, which leads to a buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-1008" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-01-10T05:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer signedness error in the ssh2_rdpkt function in PuTTY before 0.56 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SSH2_MSG_DEBUG packet with a modified stringlen parameter, which leads to a buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-2rqg-r6g4-rvxh", "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:46Z", "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1008" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17886" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=109889312917613\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12987" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13012" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17214" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1002414" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1002416" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200410-29.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=155\u0026type=vulnerabilities\u0026flashstatus=true" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11549" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.