GHSA-2RR5-68HG-RWMH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-07 18:30 – Updated: 2024-08-08 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()

The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte). After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock().

As David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use it infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF. Also, if the PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()") might reappear.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-42233"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-07T16:15:46Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfilemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()\n\nThe vmf-\u003eptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from\nhandle_pte_fault().  But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf-\u003epte). \nAfter a pte_unmap(vmf-\u003epte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table\nmay be racily changed and vmf-\u003eptl maybe fails to protect the actual page\ntable.  Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with\npte_offset_map_nolock().\n\nAs David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use\nit infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF.  Also, if\nthe PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 (\"filemap: avoid\nunnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()\") might reappear.",
  "id": "GHSA-2rr5-68hg-rwmh",
  "modified": "2024-08-08T15:31:28Z",
  "published": "2024-08-07T18:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42233"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/24be02a42181f0707be0498045c4c4b13273b16d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a6c2aec1a89506595801b4cf7e8eef035f33748"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…