ghsa-2rv8-xmpq-rpfx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:47
Modified
2022-05-01 01:47
Details
Squid 2.5 up to 2.5.STABLE7 allows remote attackers to poison the cache via an HTTP response splitting attack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-0175" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-02-07T05:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Squid 2.5 up to 2.5.STABLE7 allows remote attackers to poison the cache via an HTTP response splitting attack.", "id": "GHSA-2rv8-xmpq-rpfx", "modified": "2022-05-01T01:47:35Z", "published": "2022-05-01T01:47:35Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0175" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11605" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000931" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://fedoranews.org/updates/FEDORA--.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110780531820947\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-667" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/625878" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:034" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_06_squid.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2005-May/msg00025.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-060.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-061.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12433" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2005_5.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE7-response_splitting" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.