ghsa-2rvh-q539-q33v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:42
Modified
2022-11-03 19:12
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Apache Struts
Details
The token check mechanism in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 does not properly validate the token name configuration parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by setting the token name configuration parameter to a session attribute.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.struts:struts2-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.0.0" }, { "fixed": "2.3.4.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-4386" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-03T19:12:34Z", "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-05T23:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The token check mechanism in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 does not properly validate the token name configuration parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by setting the token name configuration parameter to a session attribute.", "id": "GHSA-2rvh-q539-q33v", "modified": "2022-11-03T19:12:34Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:42:17Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4386" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/78182" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3858" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/s2-010.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/01/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/01/5" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [], "summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery in Apache Struts" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.