GHSA-2RWX-XP6R-MHQF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:14 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:34
VLAI?
Details
LibTIFF 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5, 4.0.6 and 4.0.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TIFF image, related to "READ of size 512" and libtiff/tif_unix.c:340:2.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10269"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-24T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "LibTIFF 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5, 4.0.6 and 4.0.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TIFF image, related to \"READ of size 512\" and libtiff/tif_unix.c:340:2.",
"id": "GHSA-2rwx-xp6r-mhqf",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:14:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/1044b43637fa7f70fb19b93593777b78bd20da86"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-10269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3602-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3844"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97201"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…