GHSA-2V69-C83C-R4MH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:02 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:02
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-0427"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-01-19T12:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-2v69-c83c-r4mh",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:02:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:02:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0427"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64748"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/refs/heads/release-0.2.2:/ChangeLog"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.seul.org/or/announce/Jan-2011/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-02129-released-security-patches"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42905"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42907"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2148"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45832"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024980"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0131"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0132"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…