ghsa-2vq7-8vvf-w66v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-03 03:31
Modified
2024-05-03 03:31
Severity ?
Details
Exim libspf2 Integer Underflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Exim libspf2. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the parsing of SPF macros. When parsing SPF macros, the process does not properly validate user-supplied data, which can result in an integer underflow before writing to memory. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-17578.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-42118" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-191" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-03T03:15:50Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Exim libspf2 Integer Underflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Exim libspf2. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. \n\nThe specific flaw exists within the parsing of SPF macros. When parsing SPF macros, the process does not properly validate user-supplied data, which can result in an integer underflow before writing to memory. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-17578.", "id": "GHSA-2vq7-8vvf-w66v", "modified": "2024-05-03T03:31:04Z", "published": "2024-05-03T03:31:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-42118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1472" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.