GHSA-2XXX-V399-CP66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:29 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:29
VLAI?
Details
usersfile.c in liboath in OATH Toolkit before 2.4.1 does not properly handle lines containing an invalid one-time-password (OTP) type and a user name in /etc/users.oath, which causes the wrong line to be updated when invalidating an OTP and allows context-dependent attackers to conduct replay attacks, as demonstrated by a commented out line when using libpam-oath.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-7322"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-03-09T13:16:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "usersfile.c in liboath in OATH Toolkit before 2.4.1 does not properly handle lines containing an invalid one-time-password (OTP) type and a user name in /etc/users.oath, which causes the wrong line to be updated when invalidating an OTP and allows context-dependent attackers to conduct replay attacks, as demonstrated by a commented out line when using libpam-oath.",
"id": "GHSA-2xxx-v399-cp66",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:29:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:29:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7322"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/91316"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/oath-toolkit-help/2013-12/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/oath-toolkit-help/2013-12/msg00002.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/oath-toolkit-help/2013-12/msg00003.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/296"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.nongnu.org/oath-toolkit/NEWS.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…