ghsa-32vj-x8fv-x955
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:10
Modified
2022-05-01 18:10
Details

Memory leak in server/MaraDNS.c in MaraDNS 1.2.12.06 and 1.3.05 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via unspecified vectors, a different set of affected versions than CVE-2007-3114 and CVE-2007-3115.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-3116"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-06-07T21:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Memory leak in server/MaraDNS.c in MaraDNS 1.2.12.06 and 1.3.05 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via unspecified vectors, a different set of affected versions than CVE-2007-3114 and CVE-2007-3115.",
  "id": "GHSA-32vj-x8fv-x955",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:10:39Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:10:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3116"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://maradns.blogspot.com/search/label/MaraDNS"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/37016"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25767"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1319"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.