ghsa-333m-9882-vwgr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:13
Modified
2022-05-13 01:13
Severity ?
Details
A reachable Object::dictLookup assertion in Poppler 0.72.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service due to the lack of a check for the dict data type, as demonstrated by use of the FileSpec class (in FileSpec.cc) in pdfdetach.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-20650" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-01-01T16:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A reachable Object::dictLookup assertion in Poppler 0.72.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service due to the lack of a check for the dict data type, as demonstrated by use of the FileSpec class (in FileSpec.cc) in pdfdetach.", "id": "GHSA-333m-9882-vwgr", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:13:47Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:13:47Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-20650" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2022" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2713" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/de0c0b8324e776f0b851485e0fc9622fc35695b7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/issues/704" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00033.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/11/msg00014.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00030.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3865-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106459" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.