ghsa-337w-hr8c-gg4f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:37
Modified
2022-05-02 03:37
Details
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the PDF distiller in the Attachment Service component in Research In Motion (RIM) BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) software 4.1.3 through 5.0 and BlackBerry Professional Software 4.1.4 allow user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted .pdf file attachment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3246 and CVE-2009-0219.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-2643" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-07-28T19:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the PDF distiller in the Attachment Service component in Research In Motion (RIM) BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) software 4.1.3 through 5.0 and BlackBerry Professional Software 4.1.4 allow user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted .pdf file attachment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3246 and CVE-2009-0219.", "id": "GHSA-337w-hr8c-gg4f", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:37:15Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:37:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2643" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50755" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35254" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB18327" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/54767" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35102" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022295" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1429" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.