ghsa-33p7-cjfg-8vc5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:01
Modified
2025-04-12 13:06
Severity ?
Details
A buffer overflow in Redis 3.2.x prior to 3.2.4 causes arbitrary code execution when a crafted command is sent. An out of bounds write vulnerability exists in the handling of the client-output-buffer-limit option during the CONFIG SET command for the Redis data structure store. A crafted CONFIG SET command can lead to an out of bounds write potentially resulting in code execution.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-8339", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2016-10-28T14:59:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "A buffer overflow in Redis 3.2.x prior to 3.2.4 causes arbitrary code execution when a crafted command is sent. An out of bounds write vulnerability exists in the handling of the client-output-buffer-limit option during the CONFIG SET command for the Redis data structure store. A crafted CONFIG SET command can lead to an out of bounds write potentially resulting in code execution.", id: "GHSA-33p7-cjfg-8vc5", modified: "2025-04-12T13:06:05Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:01:11Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8339", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/6d9f8e2462fc2c426d48c941edeb78e5df7d2977", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-16", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93283", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0206", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.