GHSA-34FV-PGG7-6WVM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv6: ioam: fix type confusion of dst_entry

IOAM uses a dummy dst_entry(null_dst) to mark that the destination should not be changed after the transformation. This dst is stored in the IOAM lwt state and may be passed to dst_cache_set_ip6().

However, the IPv6 dst cache path eventually calls rt6_get_cookie(), which treats the dst_entry as part of a struct rt6_info. Since the null_dst was embedded directly as a struct dst_entry in struct ioam6_lwt, this resulted in an invalid cast and rt6_get_cookie() reading fields from the wrong object.

In practice, the wrong cookie is not used while dst->obsolete is zero, but rt6_get_cookie() may also access per-cpu value when rt->sernum is zero. In this case, rt->sernum aliases ioam6_lwt::cache::reset_ts, which can become zero, making this a potential invalid pointer access.

Fix this by embedding a full struct rt6_info for the dummy IPv6 route and passing its dst member to the dst APIs.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72429"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:16Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv6: ioam: fix type confusion of dst_entry\n\nIOAM uses a dummy dst_entry(null_dst) to mark that the destination should\nnot be changed after the transformation. This dst is stored in the IOAM lwt\nstate and may be passed to dst_cache_set_ip6().\n\nHowever, the IPv6 dst cache path eventually calls rt6_get_cookie(), which\ntreats the dst_entry as part of a struct rt6_info. Since the null_dst was\nembedded directly as a struct dst_entry in struct ioam6_lwt, this resulted\nin an invalid cast and rt6_get_cookie() reading fields from the wrong\nobject.\n\nIn practice, the wrong cookie is not used while dst-\u003eobsolete is zero, but\nrt6_get_cookie() may also access per-cpu value when rt-\u003esernum is\nzero. In this case, rt-\u003esernum aliases ioam6_lwt::cache::reset_ts, which\ncan become zero, making this a potential invalid pointer access.\n\nFix this by embedding a full struct rt6_info for the dummy IPv6 route and\npassing its dst member to the dst APIs.",
  "id": "GHSA-34fv-pgg7-6wvm",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:29Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72429"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a3b2ee1e96d0580a8ed8deda6dfa430604f9ab0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ed19e11d2146076d117d51a940643990118449b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea24f911ead85ba3d570a31e37c52b6c949f6928"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…