ghsa-34rm-j4gj-85h8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:12
Modified
2022-04-30 18:12
Details

IIS 4.0 and Site Server 3.0 allow remote attackers to read source code for ASP files if the file is in a virtual directory whose name includes extensions such as .com, .exe, .sh, .cgi, or .dll, aka the "Virtual Directory Naming" vulnerability.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2000-0025"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "1999-12-21T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IIS 4.0 and Site Server 3.0 allow remote attackers to read source code for ASP files if the file is in a virtual directory whose name includes extensions such as .com, .exe, .sh, .cgi, or .dll, aka the \"Virtual Directory Naming\" vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-34rm-j4gj-85h8",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:12:50Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:12:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2000-0025"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/1999/ms99-058"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];Q238606"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8098"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.