GHSA-35C4-F3RQ-F9G3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2018-09-17 21:57 – Updated: 2020-06-16 21:42
VLAI?
Summary
Moderate severity vulnerability that affects activesupport
Details
Withdrawn, accidental duplicate publish.
The (1) jdom.rb and (2) rexml.rb components in Active Support in Ruby on Rails before 4.1.11 and 4.2.x before 4.2.2, when JDOM or REXML is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (SystemStackError) via a large XML document depth.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "activesupport"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "activesupport"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "activesupport"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.2.22"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T20:54:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Withdrawn, accidental duplicate publish.\n\nThe (1) jdom.rb and (2) rexml.rb components in Active Support in Ruby on Rails before 4.1.11 and 4.2.x before 4.2.2, when JDOM or REXML is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (SystemStackError) via a large XML document depth.",
"id": "GHSA-35c4-f3rq-f9g3",
"modified": "2020-06-16T21:42:52Z",
"published": "2018-09-17T21:57:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3227"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35c4-f3rq-f9g3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Moderate severity vulnerability that affects activesupport",
"withdrawn": "2020-06-16T20:54:03Z"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…