GHSA-35F2-FX5V-8568
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:30 – Updated: 2025-04-12 13:01
VLAI?
Details
ber-decoder.c in Libksba before 1.3.3 uses an incorrect integer data type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted BER data, which leads to a buffer overflow.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-4354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-06-13T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ber-decoder.c in Libksba before 1.3.3 uses an incorrect integer data type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted BER data, which leads to a buffer overflow.",
"id": "GHSA-35f2-fx5v-8568",
"modified": "2025-04-12T13:01:05Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-04"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libksba.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=aea7b6032865740478ca4b706850a5217f1c3887"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libksba.git;a=commit;h=aea7b6032865740478ca4b706850a5217f1c3887"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/29/5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/29/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2982-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…