GHSA-35P7-3VG5-CCVP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-10 15:33 – Updated: 2026-08-14 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
accel: ethosu: Fix element size accounting for cmd stream validation
There are 2 issues with the element size handling in the command stream validation which result in too small of a size calculated when the element size is 16/32/64 bits.
For NHWC format, the element size is simply missing from the calculation.
The bitfield for the element size is different between IFM/IFM2 and OFM. IFM and IFM2 encode the precision in parameter bits 2:3, while OFM uses bits 1:2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-68316"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-10T13:20:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naccel: ethosu: Fix element size accounting for cmd stream validation\n\nThere are 2 issues with the element size handling in the command stream\nvalidation which result in too small of a size calculated when the\nelement size is 16/32/64 bits.\n\nFor NHWC format, the element size is simply missing from the\ncalculation.\n\nThe bitfield for the element size is different between IFM/IFM2 and\nOFM. IFM and IFM2 encode the precision in parameter bits 2:3, while OFM\nuses bits 1:2.",
"id": "GHSA-35p7-3vg5-ccvp",
"modified": "2026-08-14T00:31:55Z",
"published": "2026-08-10T15:33:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68316"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a551482a4a326790698b273e76d7575a51a57d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4ae748f8e6cb65bb86e5a281bbb5b5e5f106527"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.