GHSA-35R7-4RP8-9885

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:35 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:35
VLAI?
Details

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in mathtex.cgi in mathTeX, when downloaded before 20090713, have unspecified impact and remote attack vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-2460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-07-14T20:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in mathtex.cgi in mathTeX, when downloaded before 20090713, have unspecified impact and remote attack vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-35r7-4rp8-9885",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:35:29Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:35:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/51796"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.tex/browse_thread/thread/5d56d3d744351578"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35816"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2009-010.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/504919/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1875"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…