ghsa-35v2-jpj3-grq4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:04
Modified
2022-05-01 07:04
Details

A regression error in the restore_all code path of the 4/4GB split support for non-hugemem Linux kernels on Red Hat Linux Desktop and Enterprise Linux 4 allows local users to cause a denial of service (panic) via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-2932"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-08-23T19:04:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A regression error in the restore_all code path of the 4/4GB split support for non-hugemem Linux kernels on Red Hat Linux Desktop and Enterprise Linux 4 allows local users to cause a denial of service (panic) via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-35v2-jpj3-grq4",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:04:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:04:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2932"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11410"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21605"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22174"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2006-203.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/28120"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2006-0617.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19664"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.