GHSA-37G7-8VJJ-PJPJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-18 17:58 – Updated: 2022-07-19 18:54
VLAI?
Summary
RESTEasy 4.5.5.Final in hash flooding
Details
A vulnerability was found in RESTEasy, where RootNode incorrectly caches routes. This issue results in hash flooding, leading to slower requests with higher CPU time spent searching and adding the entry. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.5.5.Final"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jboss.resteasy:resteasy-bom"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.5.6.Final"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-14326"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-06-03T21:18:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-06-02T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in RESTEasy, where RootNode incorrectly caches routes. This issue results in hash flooding, leading to slower requests with higher CPU time spent searching and adding the entry. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service.",
"id": "GHSA-37g7-8vjj-pjpj",
"modified": "2022-07-19T18:54:16Z",
"published": "2022-03-18T17:58:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/2471"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855826"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210713-0001"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "RESTEasy 4.5.5.Final in hash flooding"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…