ghsa-38wr-8jpj-263v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:08
Modified
2022-05-01 18:08
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the Anti-Virus engine before content update 30.6 in multiple CA (formerly Computer Associates) products allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large invalid value of the coffFiles field in a .CAB file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-2864" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-06-06T21:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the Anti-Virus engine before content update 30.6 in multiple CA (formerly Computer Associates) products allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large invalid value of the coffFiles field in a .CAB file.", "id": "GHSA-38wr-8jpj-263v", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:08:03Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:08:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2864" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34737" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25570" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://supportconnectw.ca.com/public/antivirus/infodocs/caantivirus-securitynotice.asp" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/105105" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/35245" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/470602/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/470754/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24330" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018199" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2072" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-07-035.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.