ghsa-3944-77rg-ppg5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:18
Modified
2022-05-03 03:18
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the sendrmt function in bellmail in IBM AIX 5.2 and 5.3 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long parameter to the m command.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-4623" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-11-05T16:46:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the sendrmt function in bellmail in IBM AIX 5.2 and 5.3 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long parameter to the m command.", "id": "GHSA-3944-77rg-ppg5", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:18:24Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:18:24Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4623" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38150" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A4943" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=617" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27437" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1018871" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ05065" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ05066" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26257" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3669" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/subscriptions/ijhifoeblist?mode=7\u0026heading=AIX53\u0026path=%2F200710%2FSECURITY%2F20071030%2Fdatafile094529" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.