GHSA-3F6P-75G4-52MX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:43 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:43
VLAI
Details

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Intensive Point iUser Ecommerce before 2.2 have unspecified vectors and impact, as addressed by "Urgent secure fixes". NOTE: this might be a duplicate of CVE-2006-0854, but the vendor announcement for this issue (from January 8, 2005) is too vague to be sure, and CVE-2006-0854 does not provide version information.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-0874"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-02-24T11:02:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Intensive Point iUser Ecommerce before 2.2 have unspecified vectors and impact, as addressed by \"Urgent secure fixes\".  NOTE: this might be a duplicate of CVE-2006-0854, but the vendor announcement for this issue (from January 8, 2005) is too vague to be sure, and CVE-2006-0854 does not provide version information.",
  "id": "GHSA-3f6p-75g4-52mx",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:43:23Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:43:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0874"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24906"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.intensivepoint.com/iuser-document.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16787"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…