GHSA-3F8H-FGG5-J8HM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-16 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-03 18:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

pinctrl: qcom: msm: mark certain pins as invalid for interrupts

On some platforms, the UFS-reset pin has no interrupt logic in TLMM but is nevertheless registered as a GPIO in the kernel. This enables the user-space to trigger a BUG() in the pinctrl-msm driver by running, for example: gpiomon -c 0 113 on RB2.

The exact culprit is requesting pins whose intr_detection_width setting is not 1 or 2 for interrupts. This hits a BUG() in msm_gpio_irq_set_type(). Potentially crashing the kernel due to an invalid request from user-space is not optimal, so let's go through the pins and mark those that would fail the check as invalid for the irq chip as we should not even register them as available irqs.

This function can be extended if we determine that there are more corner-cases like this.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38516"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-16T11:15:44Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npinctrl: qcom: msm: mark certain pins as invalid for interrupts\n\nOn some platforms, the UFS-reset pin has no interrupt logic in TLMM but\nis nevertheless registered as a GPIO in the kernel. This enables the\nuser-space to trigger a BUG() in the pinctrl-msm driver by running, for\nexample: `gpiomon -c 0 113` on RB2.\n\nThe exact culprit is requesting pins whose intr_detection_width setting\nis not 1 or 2 for interrupts. This hits a BUG() in\nmsm_gpio_irq_set_type(). Potentially crashing the kernel due to an\ninvalid request from user-space is not optimal, so let\u0027s go through the\npins and mark those that would fail the check as invalid for the irq chip\nas we should not even register them as available irqs.\n\nThis function can be extended if we determine that there are more\ncorner-cases like this.",
  "id": "GHSA-3f8h-fgg5-j8hm",
  "modified": "2025-11-03T18:31:33Z",
  "published": "2025-08-16T12:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38516"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d57f7132662e96aace3b8a000616efde289aae1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/275605a8b48002fe98675a5c06f3e39c09067ff2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f8fc02c2582c1dfad1785e9c7bc8b4e1521af0a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a89563ccf9cd0d745e2291302878a061508573f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93712205ce2f1fb047739494c0399a26ea4f0890"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/97c9c7daeeb00c6e1d5e84084041f79c2d2dce22"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb4b08a095b1fa4b3fca782757517e4e9a917d8e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc145e02d6b8494c48f91958d52fa76b7e577f7b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00007.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.