ghsa-3gfc-hc4g-r887
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-02-12 00:01
Modified
2022-03-17 00:06
Details

Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Conda vim prior to 8.2.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-0408"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-121",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-30T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Conda vim prior to 8.2.",
  "id": "GHSA-3gfc-hc4g-r887",
  "modified": "2022-03-17T00:06:06Z",
  "published": "2022-02-12T00:01:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0408"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/06f15416bb8d5636200a10776f1752c4d6e49f31"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/5e635bad-5cf6-46cd-aeac-34ef224e179d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00018.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/11/msg00009.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZLEHVP4LNAGER4ZDGUDS5V5YVQD6INF"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UFXFAILMLUIK4MBUEZO4HNBNKYZRJ5AP"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-32"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.