GHSA-3GGV-QWCP-J6XG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-03 22:20 – Updated: 2025-09-03 22:20Impact
The attacker can validate if a user exists by checking the time login returns. This timing difference can be used to enumerate valid usernames, after which an attacker could attempt brute force attacks.
Patches
This vulnerability has been patched, implementing a timing-safe form login authenticator that ensures consistent response times regardless of whether a user exists or not.
Technical Details
The vulnerability was caused by different response times when: - A valid username was provided (password hashing occurred) - An invalid username was provided (no password hashing occurred)
The fix introduces a TimingSafeFormLoginAuthenticator that performs a dummy password hash verification even for non-existent users, ensuring consistent timing.
Workarounds
No workarounds are available. Users should upgrade to the patched version.
References
- https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/03-Identity_Management_Testing/04-Testing_for_Account_Enumeration_and_Guessable_User_Account
- https://github.com/mautic/mautic-security/pull/146
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mautic/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.4.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mautic/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.0.0-alpha"
},
{
"fixed": "5.2.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mautic/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0.0-alpha"
},
{
"fixed": "6.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-9824"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-204"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-03T22:20:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-03T15:15:49Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe attacker can validate if a user exists by checking the time login returns. This timing difference can be used to enumerate valid usernames, after which an attacker could attempt brute force attacks.\n\n### Patches\nThis vulnerability has been patched, implementing a timing-safe form login authenticator that ensures consistent response times regardless of whether a user exists or not.\n\n### Technical Details\nThe vulnerability was caused by different response times when:\n- A valid username was provided (password hashing occurred)\n- An invalid username was provided (no password hashing occurred)\n\nThe fix introduces a `TimingSafeFormLoginAuthenticator` that performs a dummy password hash verification even for non-existent users, ensuring consistent timing.\n\n### Workarounds\nNo workarounds are available. Users should upgrade to the patched version.\n\n### References\n- https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/03-Identity_Management_Testing/04-Testing_for_Account_Enumeration_and_Guessable_User_Account\n- https://github.com/mautic/mautic-security/pull/146",
"id": "GHSA-3ggv-qwcp-j6xg",
"modified": "2025-09-03T22:20:16Z",
"published": "2025-09-03T22:20:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic/security/advisories/GHSA-3ggv-qwcp-j6xg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9824"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic/commit/6bc4f5f1aabb13df12714ad0ea9fc281cbb867c6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic/commit/b4264c717ce31fbafafcefc04b02ecb9fb911e62"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Mautic Vulnerable to User Enumeration via Response Timing"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.