GHSA-3M3F-RVF7-9VP6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 12:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exfat: fix divide-by-zero in exfat_allocate_bitmap
The variable max_ra_count can be 0 in exfat_allocate_bitmap(), which causes a divide-by-zero error in the subsequent modulo operation (i % max_ra_count), leading to a system crash. When max_ra_count is 0, it means that readahead is not used. This patch load the bitmap without readahead.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68350"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T11:15:58Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix divide-by-zero in exfat_allocate_bitmap\n\nThe variable max_ra_count can be 0 in exfat_allocate_bitmap(),\nwhich causes a divide-by-zero error in the subsequent modulo operation\n(i % max_ra_count), leading to a system crash.\nWhen max_ra_count is 0, it means that readahead is not used. This patch\nload the bitmap without readahead.",
"id": "GHSA-3m3f-rvf7-9vp6",
"modified": "2025-12-24T12:30:29Z",
"published": "2025-12-24T12:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68350"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88fc3dd6e631b3e2975f898c6c2b6bc6f7058b44"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d70a5804c563b5e34825353ba9927509df709651"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…