GHSA-3M3F-RVF7-9VP6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 12:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

exfat: fix divide-by-zero in exfat_allocate_bitmap

The variable max_ra_count can be 0 in exfat_allocate_bitmap(), which causes a divide-by-zero error in the subsequent modulo operation (i % max_ra_count), leading to a system crash. When max_ra_count is 0, it means that readahead is not used. This patch load the bitmap without readahead.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-68350"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T11:15:58Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix divide-by-zero in exfat_allocate_bitmap\n\nThe variable max_ra_count can be 0 in exfat_allocate_bitmap(),\nwhich causes a divide-by-zero error in the subsequent modulo operation\n(i % max_ra_count), leading to a system crash.\nWhen max_ra_count is 0, it means that readahead is not used. This patch\nload the bitmap without readahead.",
  "id": "GHSA-3m3f-rvf7-9vp6",
  "modified": "2025-12-24T12:30:29Z",
  "published": "2025-12-24T12:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68350"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88fc3dd6e631b3e2975f898c6c2b6bc6f7058b44"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d70a5804c563b5e34825353ba9927509df709651"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…