GHSA-3M9H-22J9-8M85
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 15:30 – Updated: 2025-12-16 15:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFS: Check the TLS certificate fields in nfs_match_client()
If the TLS security policy is of type RPC_XPRTSEC_TLS_X509, then the cert_serial and privkey_serial fields need to match as well since they define the client's identity, as presented to the server.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68243"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T15:15:53Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFS: Check the TLS certificate fields in nfs_match_client()\n\nIf the TLS security policy is of type RPC_XPRTSEC_TLS_X509, then the\ncert_serial and privkey_serial fields need to match as well since they\ndefine the client\u0027s identity, as presented to the server.",
"id": "GHSA-3m9h-22j9-8m85",
"modified": "2025-12-16T15:30:46Z",
"published": "2025-12-16T15:30:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b8fa37219074811c04d4ecb742c73e2b296da6a8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb2cba0854a7f315c8100a807a6959b99d72479e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…