ghsa-3pw9-xq5q-xv5f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:43
Modified
2022-05-01 23:43
Details
Cisco Unified Communications Manager 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR7, 4.2 before 4.2(3)SR4, 4.3 before 4.3(2), 5.x before 5.1(3), and 6.x before 6.1(1) does not properly validate SIP URLs, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service interruption) via a SIP INVITE message, aka Bug ID CSCsl22355.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-1748" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-05-16T12:54:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR7, 4.2 before 4.2(3)SR4, 4.3 before 4.3(2), 5.x before 5.1(3), and 6.x before 6.1(1) does not properly validate SIP URLs, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service interruption) via a SIP INVITE message, aka Bug ID CSCsl22355.", "id": "GHSA-3pw9-xq5q-xv5f", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:43:12Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:43:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1748" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42419" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30238" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1020022" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080995688.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29221" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1533" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.